I like Lolly's idea. If enough people call and ask, especially enough members of those stations, it could be enough to get a station to do it. But don't most other radio traffic reports come from like one guy/gal? I seem to remember hearing the same traffic voice on all the Clear Channel stations as I flip around. DUQ and YEP seem to read their own (probably from the same source) but could interject the requested information (perhaps prompted by BPGH like for rain, read THIS; for fog, read THIS; for snow, read THIS). That would be a good start, moving up to actually useful information for cyclists.
I heard a thing on NPR this morning suggesting that the recent downturn in accidents and fatalities on the road was merely a phenomenon of the recession (fewer people traveling the roads) and thus temporary, while Europe's willingness to enforce the laws it has and install roundabouts to slow traffic and whatnot are inconveniences that both save lives and Europeans are willing to tolerate.
Same bit had a blurb about a guy that won an election on a promise to get rid of the cameras ticketing red light runners and then, for the first and last time in the history of the human race, succeeded in satisfying that election promise and got rid of the cameras. Because the cameras were clearly just about getting money for the municipality, which is an evil, horrible thing.
Makes me wonder, why don't they just change the laws so they can run red lights too? Or is it that everybody but _me_ should follow the laws, and _I_ shouldn't be held accountably for _my_ actions? All through the day, I me mine, I me mine, I me mine....