Since I've been in Pittsburgh, I've been grateful to see that the Colcom Foundation has supported and made possible many things -- from the purchase of Sycamore Island for the public to enjoy, the Fred Rogers Statue, efforts to revitalize and beautify downtown and make it more fun, the Pittsburgh Parks Conservancy, Western PA Conservancy, Riverlife's efforts to redo Point State Park, Friends of the Riverfront's work on trail creation and yes, Bike Pittsburgh.
All of what they support that I've seen creates things that are free to be enjoyed by EVERYONE - young and old, regardless of economic status, nationality, legal status, race or religion. That does not align at all with a world view that is racist.
In this day and age, it is so very easy to condemn, especially when "facts" are so difficult to determine. As the granddaughter of immigrants myself, like those on this forum and in the Bike Pittsburgh leadership, I feel deeply that we need to create an inclusive society and City. As world citizen, I think we all need to be concerned about over population and its impact on our environment and future generations. These are not mutually exclusive and these issues are not simple.
It's so easy to be presented with only one side of the story and to only see what we want to see. And its so very easy to villainize - especially when 'facts' are difficult to determine. For example, I've always admired the SPLC, but came across this article which challenged my thinking about how and why they create these hate group lists...
https://www.philanthropyroundtable.org/philanthropy-magazine/article/spring-2017-briefly-noted
I hope that Bike PIttsburgh and others take the time to look at the actual policies that some of the groups that Colcom supports.
To put it mildly, I am no fan of John Tanton, the founder of several of those charities. But from what I can tell from Wikipedia, around the time he was starting FAIR and CIS, he was moderate and reasonable, attracting people like Warren Buffet and Walter Cronkite. He appears to have veered terribly and disturbingly from this path - but that does not necessarily reflect those organizations now. Several of these groups testified before Congress fairly recently, so I would expect they are legitimate think tanks/policy groups. (Despite the tweets and bullying of our current President, I HOPE that our Congress is not now inviting neo nazis to the floor.)
In any case, I find it sad that we are so eager to villianize, to cling to "facts" that fit the narrative in our heads.
The fact I know 100% to be true is that Colcom contributes millions to organizations that improve our environment and the lives of every Pittsburgher. And I am grateful for them.